Uncategorized

Whether Sections 73(1)/(3) and 74(1)/(3) of the CGST Act permit a single consolidated show-cause notice for multiple financial years, in view of Sections 73(10) and 74(10)? – Rollmet LLP Vs. Union of India and Ors. – Bombay High Court

April 17, 2026

Login Decoding Indian Tax Laws Password Email OTP Google Username or Email Password 👁 Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device Sign in with Google using your registered email address. Don’t have an account? Create a new account

Whether Sections 73(1)/(3) and 74(1)/(3) of the CGST Act permit a single consolidated show-cause notice for multiple financial years, in view of Sections 73(10) and 74(10)? – Rollmet LLP Vs. Union of India and Ors. – Bombay High Court Read Post »

El Tech Power System Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Assistant Commissioner (ST), Thirumazhisai assessment Circle – Madras High Court

March 14, 2026

El Tech Power System Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Assistant Commissioner (ST), Thirumazhisai assessment Circle – Madras High Court Read Post »

Meenakshi Marketing Vs. State Tax Officer, Munichalai Road Circle – Madras High Court

February 12, 2026

(2026) taxcode.in 338 HC IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADRAS Meenakshi Marketing v. State Tax Officer, Munichalai Road Circle W.P.(MD) No. 3878 of 2026 with W.M.P(MD) No. 3175 of 2026 Decided on 12-Feb-26 Mr. Justice Krishnan Ramasamy Add. Info: For Appellant(s): Mr. S Karunakar For Respondent(s): Mr. R. Suresh Kumar, AGP ORDER The learned counsel

Meenakshi Marketing Vs. State Tax Officer, Munichalai Road Circle – Madras High Court Read Post »

Whether the assignment of leasehold rights would amount to supply of service under Section 7 of CGST Act, 2017 – Aerocom Cushions Pvt. Ltd. Thr. Authorised Director Vs. Assistant Commissioner (Anti-Evasion), CGST & CX and Anr. – Bombay High Court

January 22, 2026

Whether the assignment of leasehold rights would amount to supply of service under Section 7 of CGST Act, 2017 – Aerocom Cushions Pvt. Ltd. Thr. Authorised Director Vs. Assistant Commissioner (Anti-Evasion), CGST & CX and Anr. – Bombay High Court Read Post »

An order granting bail in a prosecution under Section 132 of the CGST Act cannot be recalled merely on the gravity of alleged GST evasion where the trial court considered the relevant factors, the evidence is largely documentary, and no misuse of bail or perversity in the order is shown – CGST, Delhi West Thr. Shri Pankaj Verma Vs. Vishal Goyal – Delhi High Court

January 12, 2026

An order granting bail in a prosecution under Section 132 of the CGST Act cannot be recalled merely on the gravity of alleged GST evasion where the trial court considered the relevant factors, the evidence is largely documentary, and no misuse of bail or perversity in the order is shown – CGST, Delhi West Thr. Shri Pankaj Verma Vs. Vishal Goyal – Delhi High Court Read Post »

Whether Sections 73(1)/(3) and 74(1)/(3) of the CGST Act permit a single consolidated show-cause notice for multiple financial years, in view of Sections 73(10) and 74(10)? – Rollmet LLP Vs. Union of India and Ors. – Bombay High Court

El Tech Power System Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Assistant Commissioner (ST), Thirumazhisai assessment Circle – Madras High Court

Meenakshi Marketing Vs. State Tax Officer, Munichalai Road Circle – Madras High Court

Whether the assignment of leasehold rights would amount to supply of service under Section 7 of CGST Act, 2017 – Aerocom Cushions Pvt. Ltd. Thr. Authorised Director Vs. Assistant Commissioner (Anti-Evasion), CGST & CX and Anr. – Bombay High Court

Suman Construction Vs. Union or India and Ors. – Bombay High Court

Commissioner of CGST and Central Excise Vs. Akbar Travels of India Pvt. Ltd. – Delhi High Court

Commissioner CGST East Delhi Vs. Amit Gupta – Delhi High Court

Krishna Petrotech and Oils Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Joint Commissioner CGST Appeals II Delhi and Ors. – Delhi High Court

Lakhmi Chand Tejoo Mal Vs. Commissioner of GST and Anr. – Delhi High Court

Green Apple Juice Shop Vs. The Assistant Commissioner, Oragadam Assessment Circle and Anr. – Madras High Court

Jayanta Kumar Maity Vs. The Superintendent of CGST and Central Excise – Orissa High Court

Commissioner CGST East Delhi Vs. Taruna Metals Pvt. Ltd. – Delhi High Court

Nanki Fashion Vs. Principal Commissioner of CGST Delhi North – Delhi High Court

Tata Steel Ltd. Vs. Union of India and Ors. – Calcutta High Court