IGST 16

Ajit Kumar Minz Vs. B.L. Agro Industries Ltd. – GSTAT, Lucknow Bench

  Start Free Trial β†— Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password πŸ‘ Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Ajit Kumar Minz Vs. B.L. Agro Industries Ltd. – GSTAT, Lucknow Bench Read Post Β»

Ajit Kumar Minz Vs. B.L. Agro Industries Ltd. – GSTAT, Lucknow Bench

  Start Free Trial β†— Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password πŸ‘ Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Ajit Kumar Minz Vs. B.L. Agro Industries Ltd. – GSTAT, Lucknow Bench Read Post Β»

Global Calcium Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India and Ors. – Madras High Court

  Start Free Trial β†— Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password πŸ‘ Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Global Calcium Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India and Ors. – Madras High Court Read Post Β»

Wipro Ltd. Vs. Assistant Commissioner Sholinganallur Division – Madras High Court

  Start Free Trial β†— Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password πŸ‘ Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Wipro Ltd. Vs. Assistant Commissioner Sholinganallur Division – Madras High Court Read Post Β»

Leben Laboratories Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India and Ors. – Bombay High Court

  Start Free Trial β†— Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password πŸ‘ Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Leben Laboratories Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India and Ors. – Bombay High Court Read Post Β»

Vishal Chaudhary Vs. Mcdonald’s India Pvt. Ltd. – GSTAT, Delhi Bench

  Start Free Trial β†— Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password πŸ‘ Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Vishal Chaudhary Vs. Mcdonald’s India Pvt. Ltd. – GSTAT, Delhi Bench Read Post Β»

Neeyamo Enterprise Solutions Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commercial Tax Officer, Madurai – Madras High Court

  Start Free Trial β†— Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password πŸ‘ Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Neeyamo Enterprise Solutions Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commercial Tax Officer, Madurai – Madras High Court Read Post Β»

Where proceedings and order under Rule 96(10) of the CGST Rules rested entirely on its alleged contravention, omission of the Rule by Notification dated 8-10-2024 without any saving clause caused pending proceedings to lapse – Techno Waxchem Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India and Ors. – Calcutta High Court

  Start Free Trial β†— Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password πŸ‘ Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Where proceedings and order under Rule 96(10) of the CGST Rules rested entirely on its alleged contravention, omission of the Rule by Notification dated 8-10-2024 without any saving clause caused pending proceedings to lapse – Techno Waxchem Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India and Ors. – Calcutta High Court Read Post Β»

Canara Bank (Formerly Syndicate Bank) Vs. Union of India and Ors. – Karnataka High Court

  Start Free Trial β†— Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password πŸ‘ Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Canara Bank (Formerly Syndicate Bank) Vs. Union of India and Ors. – Karnataka High Court Read Post Β»

Where IGST refund on zero-rated exports was delayed despite the shipping bills constituting a valid refund application and the appellate and tribunal orders having attained finality, Sections 54 and 56 of the CGST Act obligated the Department to pay interest on the belated refund – Shri. Charan Singh Surjit Singh Gujral Vs. Union of India and Ors. – Bombay High Court

  Start Free Trial β†— Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password πŸ‘ Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Where IGST refund on zero-rated exports was delayed despite the shipping bills constituting a valid refund application and the appellate and tribunal orders having attained finality, Sections 54 and 56 of the CGST Act obligated the Department to pay interest on the belated refund – Shri. Charan Singh Surjit Singh Gujral Vs. Union of India and Ors. – Bombay High Court Read Post Β»

Matters pertaining to refund are outside the purview of the Authority for Advance Ruling – In re: Arjun Knit Wear (Rangasamy Saravanakumar) – Tamil Nadu AAR (GST)

  Start Free Trial β†— Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password πŸ‘ Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Matters pertaining to refund are outside the purview of the Authority for Advance Ruling – In re: Arjun Knit Wear (Rangasamy Saravanakumar) – Tamil Nadu AAR (GST) Read Post Β»

In re: Sanctum Trading Corporation Pvt. Ltd. – Maharashtra AAR (GST)

  Start Free Trial β†— Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password πŸ‘ Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

In re: Sanctum Trading Corporation Pvt. Ltd. – Maharashtra AAR (GST) Read Post Β»

Nar Spice Products Vs. Union of Indian and Ors. – Kerala High Court

  Start Free Trial β†— Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password πŸ‘ Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Nar Spice Products Vs. Union of Indian and Ors. – Kerala High Court Read Post Β»

Scroll to Top