IGST 06

Rajeshwari Lorry Service Vs. Commercial Tax Officer and Ors. – Karnataka High Court

  Start Free Trial ↗ Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password 👁 Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Rajeshwari Lorry Service Vs. Commercial Tax Officer and Ors. – Karnataka High Court Read Post »

Where integrated tax is sought to be levied on goods imported into India, the assessment and recovery jurisdiction vests only in customs authorities under the Customs Act read with the proviso to section 5(1) of the IGST Act, and a State GST officer cannot assume such jurisdiction, particularly where the taxpayer stands administratively allotted to the Centre – Avanti Feeds Ltd. and Anr. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of State Tax and Ors. – Andhra Pradesh High Court

  Start Free Trial ↗ Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password 👁 Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Where integrated tax is sought to be levied on goods imported into India, the assessment and recovery jurisdiction vests only in customs authorities under the Customs Act read with the proviso to section 5(1) of the IGST Act, and a State GST officer cannot assume such jurisdiction, particularly where the taxpayer stands administratively allotted to the Centre – Avanti Feeds Ltd. and Anr. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of State Tax and Ors. – Andhra Pradesh High Court Read Post »

State GST officers cannot invoke Sections 129 and 130 of the IGST regime to detain or confiscate goods in transit where the inter-State movement originates outside Andhra Pradesh and culminates outside Andhra Pradesh, and undervaluation or valuation disputes do not by themselves justify such seizure or confiscation – Golden Traders and Ors. Vs. Deputy Assistant Commissioner of State Tax and Anr. – Andhra Pradesh High Court

  Start Free Trial ↗ Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password 👁 Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

State GST officers cannot invoke Sections 129 and 130 of the IGST regime to detain or confiscate goods in transit where the inter-State movement originates outside Andhra Pradesh and culminates outside Andhra Pradesh, and undervaluation or valuation disputes do not by themselves justify such seizure or confiscation – Golden Traders and Ors. Vs. Deputy Assistant Commissioner of State Tax and Anr. – Andhra Pradesh High Court Read Post »

Time Technoplast Ltd. Vs. Union of India and Ors. – Karnataka High Court

  Start Free Trial ↗ Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password 👁 Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Time Technoplast Ltd. Vs. Union of India and Ors. – Karnataka High Court Read Post »

In re: Tamil Nadu Nurses and Midwives Council – Tamil Nadu AAAR (GST)

  Start Free Trial ↗ Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password 👁 Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

In re: Tamil Nadu Nurses and Midwives Council – Tamil Nadu AAAR (GST) Read Post »

Thai Mookambikaa Ladies Hostel Vs. Union of India and Ors. – Madras High Court

  Start Free Trial ↗ Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password 👁 Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Thai Mookambikaa Ladies Hostel Vs. Union of India and Ors. – Madras High Court Read Post »

Ramesh Kumar Patodia Vs. Citi Bank Na and Ors. – Calcutta High Court

  Start Free Trial ↗ Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password 👁 Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Ramesh Kumar Patodia Vs. Citi Bank Na and Ors. – Calcutta High Court Read Post »

Sanathan Textile Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India and Anr. – Bombay High Court

  Start Free Trial ↗ Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password 👁 Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Sanathan Textile Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India and Anr. – Bombay High Court Read Post »

DPJ Bidar – Chincholi (Annuity) Road Project Pvt. Ltd. and Anr. Vs. Union of India and Ors. – Karnataka High Court

  Start Free Trial ↗ Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password 👁 Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

DPJ Bidar – Chincholi (Annuity) Road Project Pvt. Ltd. and Anr. Vs. Union of India and Ors. – Karnataka High Court Read Post »

The Principle Commissioner, CGST & CX and Anr. Vs. Joint Commissioner (Appeal), Central Tax and Anr. – Calcutta High Court

  Start Free Trial ↗ Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password 👁 Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

The Principle Commissioner, CGST & CX and Anr. Vs. Joint Commissioner (Appeal), Central Tax and Anr. – Calcutta High Court Read Post »

Union of India and Anr. Vs. Mohit Minerals Pvt. Ltd. – Supreme Court

  Start Free Trial ↗ Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password 👁 Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Union of India and Anr. Vs. Mohit Minerals Pvt. Ltd. – Supreme Court Read Post »

In re: Bharatiya Reserve Bank Note Mudran Pvt. Ltd. – Karnataka AAR (GST)

  Start Free Trial ↗ Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password 👁 Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

In re: Bharatiya Reserve Bank Note Mudran Pvt. Ltd. – Karnataka AAR (GST) Read Post »

Scroll to Top