IGST 02

Shruti Bansal Vs. Solitaire Pharmacia Pvt. Ltd. – GSTAT, Chandigarh Bench

  Start Free Trial β†— Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password πŸ‘ Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Shruti Bansal Vs. Solitaire Pharmacia Pvt. Ltd. – GSTAT, Chandigarh Bench Read Post Β»

In re: Biman Bangladesh Airlines Ltd. – West Bengal AAR (GST)

  Start Free Trial β†— Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password πŸ‘ Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

In re: Biman Bangladesh Airlines Ltd. – West Bengal AAR (GST) Read Post Β»

Vishal Chaudhary Vs. Mcdonald’s India Pvt. Ltd. – GSTAT, Delhi Bench

  Start Free Trial β†— Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password πŸ‘ Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Vishal Chaudhary Vs. Mcdonald’s India Pvt. Ltd. – GSTAT, Delhi Bench Read Post Β»

Yes Global Cargo Movers Vs. Joint Commissioner, CGST Appeals II Delhi and Ors. – GSTAT, Delhi Bench

  Start Free Trial β†— Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password πŸ‘ Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Yes Global Cargo Movers Vs. Joint Commissioner, CGST Appeals II Delhi and Ors. – GSTAT, Delhi Bench Read Post Β»

Vishal Chaudhary Vs. Honour Lane Logistics India Pvt. Ltd. – GSTAT, Delhi Bench

  Start Free Trial β†— Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password πŸ‘ Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Vishal Chaudhary Vs. Honour Lane Logistics India Pvt. Ltd. – GSTAT, Delhi Bench Read Post Β»

Vishal Chaudhary Vs. Honour Lane Logistics India Pvt. Ltd. – GSTAT, Delhi Bench

  Start Free Trial β†— Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password πŸ‘ Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Vishal Chaudhary Vs. Honour Lane Logistics India Pvt. Ltd. – GSTAT, Delhi Bench Read Post Β»

Services rendered by a foreign group procurement hub to its Indian group entity, being core procurement services supplied on its own account and not ancillary facilitation, are not intermediary services under Sections 2(13) and 13(8)(b) of the IGST Act, and the tax paid thereon as import of services is not refundable though rejection cannot be sustained merely as an afterthought under Section 54 – Dow Chemical International Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of State Tax, Mazgaon, Mumbai and Ors. – GSTAT Principal Bench

  Start Free Trial β†— Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password πŸ‘ Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Services rendered by a foreign group procurement hub to its Indian group entity, being core procurement services supplied on its own account and not ancillary facilitation, are not intermediary services under Sections 2(13) and 13(8)(b) of the IGST Act, and the tax paid thereon as import of services is not refundable though rejection cannot be sustained merely as an afterthought under Section 54 – Dow Chemical International Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of State Tax, Mazgaon, Mumbai and Ors. – GSTAT Principal Bench Read Post Β»

L M Wind Power Blades India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Joint Commissioner, Central Tax GST Appeals-II and Anr. – Karnataka High Court

  Start Free Trial β†— Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password πŸ‘ Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

L M Wind Power Blades India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Joint Commissioner, Central Tax GST Appeals-II and Anr. – Karnataka High Court Read Post Β»

GST is payable on the commission paid to the director, who is a foreign national, for marketing and sourcing of orders as it falls within the the ambit of Import of Services in terms of Section 2(11) of the IGST Act, 2017 and liable to tax under reverse charge – In Re: Sampurnam Hosieries Impex Pvt. Ltd. – Tamil Nadu AAR (GST)

  Start Free Trial β†— Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password πŸ‘ Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

GST is payable on the commission paid to the director, who is a foreign national, for marketing and sourcing of orders as it falls within the the ambit of Import of Services in terms of Section 2(11) of the IGST Act, 2017 and liable to tax under reverse charge – In Re: Sampurnam Hosieries Impex Pvt. Ltd. – Tamil Nadu AAR (GST) Read Post Β»

Directorate General of Goods and Services Tax Intelligence (HQS) and Ors. Vs. Gameskraft Technologies Pvt. Ltd. and Ors. – Supreme Court

  Start Free Trial β†— Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password πŸ‘ Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Directorate General of Goods and Services Tax Intelligence (HQS) and Ors. Vs. Gameskraft Technologies Pvt. Ltd. and Ors. – Supreme Court Read Post Β»

Fateh Education Consulting Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Assistant Commissioner, CGST Division, Wazirpur and Anr. – Delhi High Court

  Start Free Trial β†— Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password πŸ‘ Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Fateh Education Consulting Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Assistant Commissioner, CGST Division, Wazirpur and Anr. – Delhi High Court Read Post Β»

Settlement of a foreign arbitral award and consequential withdrawal or suspension of enforcement proceedings, absent any independent agreement and separate consideration, do not constitute supply under Section 7 read with Entry 5(e) of Schedule II of the CGST Act – Tata Sons Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India and Ors. – Bombay High Court

  Start Free Trial β†— Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password πŸ‘ Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Settlement of a foreign arbitral award and consequential withdrawal or suspension of enforcement proceedings, absent any independent agreement and separate consideration, do not constitute supply under Section 7 read with Entry 5(e) of Schedule II of the CGST Act – Tata Sons Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India and Ors. – Bombay High Court Read Post Β»

In re: Sanctum Trading Corporation Pvt. Ltd. – Maharashtra AAR (GST)

  Start Free Trial β†— Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password πŸ‘ Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

In re: Sanctum Trading Corporation Pvt. Ltd. – Maharashtra AAR (GST) Read Post Β»

Scroll to Top