CGST 60

Fastenex Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State Tax Officer (Inspection-VI) – Madras High Court

  Start Free Trial ↗ Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password 👁 Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Fastenex Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State Tax Officer (Inspection-VI) – Madras High Court Read Post »

Tata Projects Ltd. Vs. Union of India and Ors. – Gauhati High Court

  Start Free Trial ↗ Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password 👁 Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Tata Projects Ltd. Vs. Union of India and Ors. – Gauhati High Court Read Post »

Sections 73 and 74 of the CGST Act permit issuance of a consolidated show cause notice covering multiple tax periods or financial years, and reading a financial year restriction into those provisions would amount to impermissible rewriting of the statute; orders quashing such notices were set aside – Commissioner of Central Tax, Bengaluru and Anr. Vs. Chimney Hills Education Society – Karnataka High Court

  Start Free Trial ↗ Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password 👁 Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Sections 73 and 74 of the CGST Act permit issuance of a consolidated show cause notice covering multiple tax periods or financial years, and reading a financial year restriction into those provisions would amount to impermissible rewriting of the statute; orders quashing such notices were set aside – Commissioner of Central Tax, Bengaluru and Anr. Vs. Chimney Hills Education Society – Karnataka High Court Read Post »

Avik Televentures Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Office of The GST Officer Ward 71 – Delhi High Court

  Start Free Trial ↗ Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password 👁 Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Avik Televentures Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Office of The GST Officer Ward 71 – Delhi High Court Read Post »

Under Section 54 of the CGST Act, the two-year period for refund is mandatory for the proper officer, but in the absence of any statutory mechanism for condonation, delayed refund claims may be entertained under Article 226 with corresponding extension to the Revenue to invoke Sections 73 and 74 – Assistant Commissioner of Central Taxes North West Division -1, North West Commissionerate and Ors. Vs. Merck Life Science Pvt. Ltd. – Karnataka High Court

  Start Free Trial ↗ Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password 👁 Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Under Section 54 of the CGST Act, the two-year period for refund is mandatory for the proper officer, but in the absence of any statutory mechanism for condonation, delayed refund claims may be entertained under Article 226 with corresponding extension to the Revenue to invoke Sections 73 and 74 – Assistant Commissioner of Central Taxes North West Division -1, North West Commissionerate and Ors. Vs. Merck Life Science Pvt. Ltd. – Karnataka High Court Read Post »

SA Aromatics Pvt. Ltd. and Anr. Vs. Union of India and Ors. – Allahabad High Court

  Start Free Trial ↗ Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password 👁 Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

SA Aromatics Pvt. Ltd. and Anr. Vs. Union of India and Ors. – Allahabad High Court Read Post »

Roche Diagnostics India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Delhi State Health Mission and Anr. – Delhi High Court

  Start Free Trial ↗ Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password 👁 Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Roche Diagnostics India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Delhi State Health Mission and Anr. – Delhi High Court Read Post »

Union of India and Ors. Vs. Bharat Forge Ltd. and Anr. – Supreme Court

  Start Free Trial ↗ Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password 👁 Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Union of India and Ors. Vs. Bharat Forge Ltd. and Anr. – Supreme Court Read Post »

Akhil Krishan Maggu and Anr. Vs. Deputy Director, Directorate General of GST Intelligence and Ors. – Punjab & Haryana High Court

  Start Free Trial ↗ Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password 👁 Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Akhil Krishan Maggu and Anr. Vs. Deputy Director, Directorate General of GST Intelligence and Ors. – Punjab & Haryana High Court Read Post »

Jayachandran Alloys Pvt. Ltd. Vs. The Superintendent of GST and Central Excise and Ors. – Madras High Court

  Start Free Trial ↗ Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password 👁 Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Jayachandran Alloys Pvt. Ltd. Vs. The Superintendent of GST and Central Excise and Ors. – Madras High Court Read Post »

Scroll to Top