CGST 52

Jai Ambey Road Lines Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and Ors. – Chhattisgarh High Court

  Start Free Trial ↗ Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password 👁 Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Jai Ambey Road Lines Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and Ors. – Chhattisgarh High Court Read Post »

Crossfields Synergy Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Taxes and Anr. – Karnataka High Court

  Start Free Trial ↗ Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password 👁 Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Crossfields Synergy Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Taxes and Anr. – Karnataka High Court Read Post »

Sakhsham Knowledge Services Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Nitin Bansal, Commissioner State Tax Lucknow and Ors. – GSTAT, Lucknow Bench

  Start Free Trial ↗ Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password 👁 Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Sakhsham Knowledge Services Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Nitin Bansal, Commissioner State Tax Lucknow and Ors. – GSTAT, Lucknow Bench Read Post »

JVS Agencies Vs. Superintendent Range-III, Thiruvottiyur Division – Madras High Court

  Start Free Trial ↗ Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password 👁 Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

JVS Agencies Vs. Superintendent Range-III, Thiruvottiyur Division – Madras High Court Read Post »

Under Sections 44 and 47 of the CGST/TNGST Acts read with Rule 80(3), belated non-filing of Form GSTR-9C along with GSTR-9 amounts to failure to furnish the annual return as required by Section 44, justifying levy of late fee – Madhu Agencies Vs. State Tax Officer – Madras High Court

  Start Free Trial ↗ Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password 👁 Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Under Sections 44 and 47 of the CGST/TNGST Acts read with Rule 80(3), belated non-filing of Form GSTR-9C along with GSTR-9 amounts to failure to furnish the annual return as required by Section 44, justifying levy of late fee – Madhu Agencies Vs. State Tax Officer – Madras High Court Read Post »

Sections 73 and 74 of the CGST Act permit issuance of a consolidated show cause notice covering multiple tax periods or financial years, and reading a financial year restriction into those provisions would amount to impermissible rewriting of the statute; orders quashing such notices were set aside – Commissioner of Central Tax, Bengaluru and Anr. Vs. Chimney Hills Education Society – Karnataka High Court

  Start Free Trial ↗ Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password 👁 Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Sections 73 and 74 of the CGST Act permit issuance of a consolidated show cause notice covering multiple tax periods or financial years, and reading a financial year restriction into those provisions would amount to impermissible rewriting of the statute; orders quashing such notices were set aside – Commissioner of Central Tax, Bengaluru and Anr. Vs. Chimney Hills Education Society – Karnataka High Court Read Post »

Biswajit Sutradhar Vs. State of Assam and Ors. – Gauhati High Court

  Start Free Trial ↗ Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password 👁 Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Biswajit Sutradhar Vs. State of Assam and Ors. – Gauhati High Court Read Post »

Shree Ambica Auto Sales and Service and Anr. Vs. Union Bank of India and Anr. – Gujarat High Court

  Start Free Trial ↗ Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password 👁 Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Shree Ambica Auto Sales and Service and Anr. Vs. Union Bank of India and Anr. – Gujarat High Court Read Post »

Macmet Engineering Ltd. Vs. State Tax Officer-III, (Intelligence) – Madras High Court

  Start Free Trial ↗ Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password 👁 Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Macmet Engineering Ltd. Vs. State Tax Officer-III, (Intelligence) – Madras High Court Read Post »

The opening words ‘any person’ in Section 122(1A) of the CGST Act, 2017, are to be understood in the context of a ‘taxable person’, since sub-section (1) itself applies to a taxable person – Amit Manilal Haria and Ors. Vs. Joint Commissioner, CGST & Central Excise and Anr. – Bombay High Court

  Start Free Trial ↗ Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password 👁 Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

The opening words ‘any person’ in Section 122(1A) of the CGST Act, 2017, are to be understood in the context of a ‘taxable person’, since sub-section (1) itself applies to a taxable person – Amit Manilal Haria and Ors. Vs. Joint Commissioner, CGST & Central Excise and Anr. – Bombay High Court Read Post »

Loksatya Media Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Goods and Service Tax and Anr. – Delhi High Court

  Start Free Trial ↗ Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password 👁 Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Loksatya Media Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Goods and Service Tax and Anr. – Delhi High Court Read Post »

C Muniraju Vs. S N Subbareddy Alias Chinnakayalapalli and Ors. – Karnataka High Court

  Start Free Trial ↗ Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password 👁 Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

C Muniraju Vs. S N Subbareddy Alias Chinnakayalapalli and Ors. – Karnataka High Court Read Post »

Late fee under Section 47(2) of CGST Act, though termed a fee, is penal in nature | Once late fee is levied, general penalty under Section 125 cannot also be imposed – Kandan Hardware Mart Vs. Assistant Commissioner (ST) (FAC), Park Town Assessment Circle – Madras High Court

  Start Free Trial ↗ Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password 👁 Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Late fee under Section 47(2) of CGST Act, though termed a fee, is penal in nature | Once late fee is levied, general penalty under Section 125 cannot also be imposed – Kandan Hardware Mart Vs. Assistant Commissioner (ST) (FAC), Park Town Assessment Circle – Madras High Court Read Post »

Scroll to Top