CGST 38

Ashutosh Bandyopadhay and Ors. Vs. Union of India and Ors. – Tripura High Court

  Start Free Trial ↗ Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password 👁 Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Ashutosh Bandyopadhay and Ors. Vs. Union of India and Ors. – Tripura High Court Read Post »

Settlement of a foreign arbitral award and consequential withdrawal or suspension of enforcement proceedings, absent any independent agreement and separate consideration, do not constitute supply under Section 7 read with Entry 5(e) of Schedule II of the CGST Act – Tata Sons Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India and Ors. – Bombay High Court

  Start Free Trial ↗ Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password 👁 Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Settlement of a foreign arbitral award and consequential withdrawal or suspension of enforcement proceedings, absent any independent agreement and separate consideration, do not constitute supply under Section 7 read with Entry 5(e) of Schedule II of the CGST Act – Tata Sons Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India and Ors. – Bombay High Court Read Post »

Sections 73 and 74 of the CGST Act permit issuance of a consolidated show cause notice covering multiple tax periods or financial years, and reading a financial year restriction into those provisions would amount to impermissible rewriting of the statute; orders quashing such notices were set aside – Commissioner of Central Tax, Bengaluru and Anr. Vs. Chimney Hills Education Society – Karnataka High Court

  Start Free Trial ↗ Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password 👁 Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Sections 73 and 74 of the CGST Act permit issuance of a consolidated show cause notice covering multiple tax periods or financial years, and reading a financial year restriction into those provisions would amount to impermissible rewriting of the statute; orders quashing such notices were set aside – Commissioner of Central Tax, Bengaluru and Anr. Vs. Chimney Hills Education Society – Karnataka High Court Read Post »

Sada Shiv Alloys Vs. State of Punjab and Ors. – Punjab & Haryana High Court

  Start Free Trial ↗ Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password 👁 Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Sada Shiv Alloys Vs. State of Punjab and Ors. – Punjab & Haryana High Court Read Post »

Shree Ambica Auto Sales and Service and Anr. Vs. Union Bank of India and Anr. – Gujarat High Court

  Start Free Trial ↗ Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password 👁 Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Shree Ambica Auto Sales and Service and Anr. Vs. Union Bank of India and Anr. – Gujarat High Court Read Post »

Rule 39(1)(a) of the CGST Rules requiring distribution of input tax credit available for distribution in a month to be made in the same month must be construed harmoniously with Sections 16 and 20 of the CGST Act as applying only after fulfilment of Section 16(2) conditions, and is therefore not ultra vires – Reliance Jio Infocomm Ltd. Vs. Union of India and Ors. – Madras High Court

  Start Free Trial ↗ Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password 👁 Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Rule 39(1)(a) of the CGST Rules requiring distribution of input tax credit available for distribution in a month to be made in the same month must be construed harmoniously with Sections 16 and 20 of the CGST Act as applying only after fulfilment of Section 16(2) conditions, and is therefore not ultra vires – Reliance Jio Infocomm Ltd. Vs. Union of India and Ors. – Madras High Court Read Post »

N. Chetia and Sons Trading and Ors. Vs. State of Assam and Ors. – Gauhati High Court

  Start Free Trial ↗ Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password 👁 Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

N. Chetia and Sons Trading and Ors. Vs. State of Assam and Ors. – Gauhati High Court Read Post »

Sriba Nirman Company Vs. Commissioner (Appeals), Guntur and Ors. – Andhra Pradesh High Court

  Start Free Trial ↗ Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password 👁 Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Sriba Nirman Company Vs. Commissioner (Appeals), Guntur and Ors. – Andhra Pradesh High Court Read Post »

Event Management and Tourism Service Provider is eligible to avail ITC on food and beverage services under Section 17(5) of CGST Act in event management and tourism services | No separate invoices are required from hotel vendors for claiming ITC on food and beverage services? – In re: Citius Holidays Pvt. Ltd. – West Bengal AAR (GST)

  Start Free Trial ↗ Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password 👁 Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Event Management and Tourism Service Provider is eligible to avail ITC on food and beverage services under Section 17(5) of CGST Act in event management and tourism services | No separate invoices are required from hotel vendors for claiming ITC on food and beverage services? – In re: Citius Holidays Pvt. Ltd. – West Bengal AAR (GST) Read Post »

Hindustan Construction Company Ltd. Vs. Union of India and Ors. – Karnataka High Court

  Start Free Trial ↗ Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password 👁 Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Hindustan Construction Company Ltd. Vs. Union of India and Ors. – Karnataka High Court Read Post »

Bidyut Autotech Pvt. Ltd. and Anr. Vs. Assistant Commissioner of State Tax, Bureau of Investigation and Ors. – Calcutta High Court

  Start Free Trial ↗ Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password 👁 Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Bidyut Autotech Pvt. Ltd. and Anr. Vs. Assistant Commissioner of State Tax, Bureau of Investigation and Ors. – Calcutta High Court Read Post »

AKA Logistics Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India – Jharkhand High Court

  Start Free Trial ↗ Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password 👁 Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

AKA Logistics Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India – Jharkhand High Court Read Post »

Railroad Logistics (India) Pvt. Ltd. Vs. The Union of India and Ors. – Bombay High Court

  Start Free Trial ↗ Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password 👁 Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Railroad Logistics (India) Pvt. Ltd. Vs. The Union of India and Ors. – Bombay High Court Read Post »

Scroll to Top