CGST 36

City Lights and Equipments Vs. State of Meghalaya and Ors. – Meghalaya High Court

  Start Free Trial ↗ Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password 👁 Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

City Lights and Equipments Vs. State of Meghalaya and Ors. – Meghalaya High Court Read Post »

Sections 73 and 74 of the CGST Act permit issuance of a consolidated show cause notice covering multiple tax periods or financial years, and reading a financial year restriction into those provisions would amount to impermissible rewriting of the statute; orders quashing such notices were set aside – Commissioner of Central Tax, Bengaluru and Anr. Vs. Chimney Hills Education Society – Karnataka High Court

  Start Free Trial ↗ Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password 👁 Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Sections 73 and 74 of the CGST Act permit issuance of a consolidated show cause notice covering multiple tax periods or financial years, and reading a financial year restriction into those provisions would amount to impermissible rewriting of the statute; orders quashing such notices were set aside – Commissioner of Central Tax, Bengaluru and Anr. Vs. Chimney Hills Education Society – Karnataka High Court Read Post »

Under Section 54 of the CGST Act, the two-year period for refund is mandatory for the proper officer, but in the absence of any statutory mechanism for condonation, delayed refund claims may be entertained under Article 226 with corresponding extension to the Revenue to invoke Sections 73 and 74 – Assistant Commissioner of Central Taxes North West Division -1, North West Commissionerate and Ors. Vs. Merck Life Science Pvt. Ltd. – Karnataka High Court

  Start Free Trial ↗ Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password 👁 Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Under Section 54 of the CGST Act, the two-year period for refund is mandatory for the proper officer, but in the absence of any statutory mechanism for condonation, delayed refund claims may be entertained under Article 226 with corresponding extension to the Revenue to invoke Sections 73 and 74 – Assistant Commissioner of Central Taxes North West Division -1, North West Commissionerate and Ors. Vs. Merck Life Science Pvt. Ltd. – Karnataka High Court Read Post »

SA Aromatics Pvt. Ltd. and Anr. Vs. Union of India and Ors. – Allahabad High Court

  Start Free Trial ↗ Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password 👁 Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

SA Aromatics Pvt. Ltd. and Anr. Vs. Union of India and Ors. – Allahabad High Court Read Post »

Milroc Good Earth Developers Vs. Union of India and Ors. – Bombay High Court

  Start Free Trial ↗ Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password 👁 Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Milroc Good Earth Developers Vs. Union of India and Ors. – Bombay High Court Read Post »

Seyad Shariat Finance Ltd. Vs. The State of Tamil Nadu – Madras High Court

  Start Free Trial ↗ Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password 👁 Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Seyad Shariat Finance Ltd. Vs. The State of Tamil Nadu – Madras High Court Read Post »

Vivo Mobile India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India and Ors. – Allahabad High Court

  Start Free Trial ↗ Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password 👁 Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Vivo Mobile India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India and Ors. – Allahabad High Court Read Post »

In re: Tamil Nadu Nurses and Midwives Council – Tamil Nadu AAR (GST)

  Start Free Trial ↗ Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password 👁 Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

In re: Tamil Nadu Nurses and Midwives Council – Tamil Nadu AAR (GST) Read Post »

Scroll to Top