CGST 174

Sampark Industries Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Goods and Services Tax – Allahabad High Court

  Start Free Trial β†— Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password πŸ‘ Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Sampark Industries Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Goods and Services Tax – Allahabad High Court Read Post Β»

Anjani Kumar Singh Vs. Addnl. Commissioner (CCO) of CGST and Central Excise and Anr. – Patna High Court

  Start Free Trial β†— Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password πŸ‘ Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Anjani Kumar Singh Vs. Addnl. Commissioner (CCO) of CGST and Central Excise and Anr. – Patna High Court Read Post Β»

Assam Rifles Group Insurance Scheme Vs. Additional Director General (Adjudication), Directorate General of GST Intelligence and Ors. – Meghalaya High Court

  Start Free Trial β†— Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password πŸ‘ Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Assam Rifles Group Insurance Scheme Vs. Additional Director General (Adjudication), Directorate General of GST Intelligence and Ors. – Meghalaya High Court Read Post Β»

Tata Unistore Ltd. Vs. Commissioner CGST & Ex. and Ors. – GSTAT, Thane Bench

  Start Free Trial β†— Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password πŸ‘ Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Tata Unistore Ltd. Vs. Commissioner CGST & Ex. and Ors. – GSTAT, Thane Bench Read Post Β»

Rakesh Kumar Jain Vs. Union of India and Ors. – Chhattisgarh High Court

  Start Free Trial β†— Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password πŸ‘ Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Rakesh Kumar Jain Vs. Union of India and Ors. – Chhattisgarh High Court Read Post Β»

Dilip Babubhai Patel Vs. State of Gujarat and Anr. – Gujarat High Court

  Start Free Trial β†— Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password πŸ‘ Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Dilip Babubhai Patel Vs. State of Gujarat and Anr. – Gujarat High Court Read Post Β»

Directorate General of GST Intelligence Vs. Girish Sachdeva – Delhi High Court

  Start Free Trial β†— Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password πŸ‘ Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Directorate General of GST Intelligence Vs. Girish Sachdeva – Delhi High Court Read Post Β»

Where prolonged custody in predicate and tax proceedings, partial payment of assessed tax liability, and subsisting attachment of assets led the Court to find that no useful purpose would be served by further detention, regular bail was granted without expressing any opinion on merits – Radhey Shyam and Anr. Vs. Assistant Commissioner – Supreme Court

  Start Free Trial β†— Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password πŸ‘ Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Where prolonged custody in predicate and tax proceedings, partial payment of assessed tax liability, and subsisting attachment of assets led the Court to find that no useful purpose would be served by further detention, regular bail was granted without expressing any opinion on merits – Radhey Shyam and Anr. Vs. Assistant Commissioner – Supreme Court Read Post Β»

Commissioner of CGST and Excise Vs. Rishu Enterprise – Gauhati High Court

  Start Free Trial β†— Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password πŸ‘ Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Commissioner of CGST and Excise Vs. Rishu Enterprise – Gauhati High Court Read Post Β»

Sheesha Sky Lounge Hospitality and Services Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India and Anr. – Bombay High Court

  Start Free Trial β†— Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password πŸ‘ Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Sheesha Sky Lounge Hospitality and Services Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India and Anr. – Bombay High Court Read Post Β»

Commissioner of CGST and Excise Vs. Rishu Enterprise – Gauhati High Court

  Start Free Trial β†— Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password πŸ‘ Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Commissioner of CGST and Excise Vs. Rishu Enterprise – Gauhati High Court Read Post Β»

Sri Gouribidanur Venkatakrishna Kumar Vs. Asst. Commissioner CGST-Central Excise – Karnataka High Court

  Start Free Trial β†— Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password πŸ‘ Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Sri Gouribidanur Venkatakrishna Kumar Vs. Asst. Commissioner CGST-Central Excise – Karnataka High Court Read Post Β»

Sachde Roadlines Vs. Union of India and Ors. – Gujarat High Court

  Start Free Trial β†— Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password πŸ‘ Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Sachde Roadlines Vs. Union of India and Ors. – Gujarat High Court Read Post Β»

Monetary limit for non-filing of appeals or applications before the GSTAT, High Court, and Supreme Court, as fixed by the Circular dated 26.06.2024, is applicable even in respect of pending appeals | The Circular applies to both pending and future appeals – Commissioner of Commercial Tax and Ors. Vs. Vikaram Cement – Supreme Court

  Start Free Trial β†— Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password πŸ‘ Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Monetary limit for non-filing of appeals or applications before the GSTAT, High Court, and Supreme Court, as fixed by the Circular dated 26.06.2024, is applicable even in respect of pending appeals | The Circular applies to both pending and future appeals – Commissioner of Commercial Tax and Ors. Vs. Vikaram Cement – Supreme Court Read Post Β»

Scroll to Top