CGST 133

Director General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) Vs. Pivotal Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. – GSTAT Principal Bench

  Start Free Trial β†— Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password πŸ‘ Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Director General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) Vs. Pivotal Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. – GSTAT Principal Bench Read Post Β»

Director General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) Vs. Mallikarjuna Cinema Hall – GSTAT Principal Bench

  Start Free Trial β†— Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password πŸ‘ Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Director General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) Vs. Mallikarjuna Cinema Hall – GSTAT Principal Bench Read Post Β»

Whether the Proper Officer/Adjudicating Officer has the power to adjudicate on the penalty provision provided under Section 122 of the CGST Act? | Whether dropping of proceedings under Section 74 of the CGST Act, 2017 will ipso facto abate the proceedings under Section 122 of the CGST Act? – Patanjali Ayurved Ltd. Vs. Union of India and Ors. – Allahabad High Court

  Start Free Trial β†— Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password πŸ‘ Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Whether the Proper Officer/Adjudicating Officer has the power to adjudicate on the penalty provision provided under Section 122 of the CGST Act? | Whether dropping of proceedings under Section 74 of the CGST Act, 2017 will ipso facto abate the proceedings under Section 122 of the CGST Act? – Patanjali Ayurved Ltd. Vs. Union of India and Ors. – Allahabad High Court Read Post Β»

Theco India Pvt. Ltd. v. The Secretary, The National Anti-profiteering Authority and Anr. – Madras High Court

  Start Free Trial β†— Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password πŸ‘ Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Theco India Pvt. Ltd. v. The Secretary, The National Anti-profiteering Authority and Anr. – Madras High Court Read Post Β»

Scroll to Top