CGST 13

Groma Infrastructure Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Commercial Taxes – GSTAT, Bengaluru Bench

  Start Free Trial β†— Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password πŸ‘ Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Groma Infrastructure Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Commercial Taxes – GSTAT, Bengaluru Bench Read Post Β»

Bhagya Kalita Vs. Union of India and Ors. – Gauhati High Court

  Start Free Trial β†— Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password πŸ‘ Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Bhagya Kalita Vs. Union of India and Ors. – Gauhati High Court Read Post Β»

Goutam Engineering Concern Vs. West Bengal State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd. and Ors. – Calcutta High Court

  Start Free Trial β†— Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password πŸ‘ Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Goutam Engineering Concern Vs. West Bengal State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd. and Ors. – Calcutta High Court Read Post Β»

Naveen Kumar Vs. State of Haryana and Anr. – Punjab & Haryana High Court

  Start Free Trial β†— Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password πŸ‘ Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Naveen Kumar Vs. State of Haryana and Anr. – Punjab & Haryana High Court Read Post Β»

B.H. Gangadharachar Contractor Vs. State of Karnataka and Anr. – Karnataka High Court

  Start Free Trial β†— Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password πŸ‘ Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

B.H. Gangadharachar Contractor Vs. State of Karnataka and Anr. – Karnataka High Court Read Post Β»

Psy Constructions Vs. State of Karnataka and Ors. – Karnataka High Court

  Start Free Trial β†— Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password πŸ‘ Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Psy Constructions Vs. State of Karnataka and Ors. – Karnataka High Court Read Post Β»

Torrent Power Ltd. Vs. Union of India and Ors. – Gujarat High Court

  Start Free Trial β†— Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password πŸ‘ Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Torrent Power Ltd. Vs. Union of India and Ors. – Gujarat High Court Read Post Β»

Kanwal Chaudhary Vs. Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India and Ors. – Delhi High Court

  Start Free Trial β†— Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password πŸ‘ Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Kanwal Chaudhary Vs. Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India and Ors. – Delhi High Court Read Post Β»

SEL Manufacturing Company Ltd. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and Ors. – Madhya Pradesh High Court

  Start Free Trial β†— Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password πŸ‘ Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

SEL Manufacturing Company Ltd. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and Ors. – Madhya Pradesh High Court Read Post Β»

Fastenex Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State Tax Officer (Inspection-VI) – Madras High Court

  Start Free Trial β†— Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password πŸ‘ Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Fastenex Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State Tax Officer (Inspection-VI) – Madras High Court Read Post Β»

Where challenge to GST demand on BOT annuity receipts turns on service classification, exemption under Entry 23A and competence of officers acting under notifications issued under Sections 3 and 5 of the CGST Act, and no patent lack of jurisdiction or other exception to the rule of alternate remedy is established, writ petition against the show cause notice and Order-in-Original is not maintainable and the assessee must pursue appeal under Section 107 – Jorabat Shillong Expressway Ltd. Vs. Union of India and Ors. – Meghalaya High Court

  Start Free Trial β†— Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password πŸ‘ Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Where challenge to GST demand on BOT annuity receipts turns on service classification, exemption under Entry 23A and competence of officers acting under notifications issued under Sections 3 and 5 of the CGST Act, and no patent lack of jurisdiction or other exception to the rule of alternate remedy is established, writ petition against the show cause notice and Order-in-Original is not maintainable and the assessee must pursue appeal under Section 107 – Jorabat Shillong Expressway Ltd. Vs. Union of India and Ors. – Meghalaya High Court Read Post Β»

S. S. Alur Construction Company Vs. Chief Engineer, PIU, State Highway Department and Ors. – Karnataka High Court

  Start Free Trial β†— Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password πŸ‘ Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

S. S. Alur Construction Company Vs. Chief Engineer, PIU, State Highway Department and Ors. – Karnataka High Court Read Post Β»

In re: Jolarpettai Veeramuthu Sreedhar – Tamil Nadu AAR (GST)

  Start Free Trial β†— Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password πŸ‘ Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

In re: Jolarpettai Veeramuthu Sreedhar – Tamil Nadu AAR (GST) Read Post Β»

Whether the collection of corpus fund from members for the purpose of meeting future capital expenditure amounts to a supply under Section 7 of the CGST Act, 2017? – In re: Sandeep Vihar Owners Association (Svoa) – Karnataka AAR (GST)

  Start Free Trial β†— Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password πŸ‘ Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Whether the collection of corpus fund from members for the purpose of meeting future capital expenditure amounts to a supply under Section 7 of the CGST Act, 2017? – In re: Sandeep Vihar Owners Association (Svoa) – Karnataka AAR (GST) Read Post Β»

Scroll to Top