74 (5)

Supra Enterprises Vs. Assistant Commissioner Circle 6 Central GST Audit 1 and Ors. – Delhi High Court

  Start Free Trial ↗ Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password 👁 Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Supra Enterprises Vs. Assistant Commissioner Circle 6 Central GST Audit 1 and Ors. – Delhi High Court Read Post »

I-NXT Vs. Sandeep Banga, Commissioner, Bengaluru Zone and Ors. – GSTAT, Bengaluru Bench

  Start Free Trial ↗ Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password 👁 Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

I-NXT Vs. Sandeep Banga, Commissioner, Bengaluru Zone and Ors. – GSTAT, Bengaluru Bench Read Post »

Raghuvir Developers and Builders Vs. Assistant Commissioner, CGST and CE, Division-II, Surat – Gujarat High Court

  Start Free Trial ↗ Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password 👁 Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Raghuvir Developers and Builders Vs. Assistant Commissioner, CGST and CE, Division-II, Surat – Gujarat High Court Read Post »

Karan Kochhar Vs. Inspector (Anti-Evasion) of CGST Commissionerate – Punjab & Haryana High Court

  Start Free Trial ↗ Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password 👁 Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Karan Kochhar Vs. Inspector (Anti-Evasion) of CGST Commissionerate – Punjab & Haryana High Court Read Post »

Atul Modi Vs. Directorate General of Goods and Service Tax Intelligence – Delhi High Court

  Start Free Trial ↗ Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password 👁 Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Atul Modi Vs. Directorate General of Goods and Service Tax Intelligence – Delhi High Court Read Post »

Council for the Indian School Certificate Examinations Vs. CGST Delhi East, Commissioner, ITO and Ors. – GSTAT, Delhi Bench

  Start Free Trial ↗ Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password 👁 Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Council for the Indian School Certificate Examinations Vs. CGST Delhi East, Commissioner, ITO and Ors. – GSTAT, Delhi Bench Read Post »

MRF Ltd. Vs. Additional Director DGGI, Delhi Zonal Unit, Directorate General of GST Intelligence and Anr. – Madras High Court

  Start Free Trial ↗ Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password 👁 Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

MRF Ltd. Vs. Additional Director DGGI, Delhi Zonal Unit, Directorate General of GST Intelligence and Anr. – Madras High Court Read Post »

Mill Tech CNC Application Vs. Additional Commissioner (Appeals), Office of the Commissioner GST and Central Excise (Appeals), Coimbatore Circuit Office – Madras High Court

  Start Free Trial ↗ Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password 👁 Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Mill Tech CNC Application Vs. Additional Commissioner (Appeals), Office of the Commissioner GST and Central Excise (Appeals), Coimbatore Circuit Office – Madras High Court Read Post »

Bhima Enterprises Vs. Principle Chief Commissioner of GST & Central Excise Tamil Nadu & Puducherry and Ors. – Madras High Court

  Start Free Trial ↗ Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password 👁 Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Bhima Enterprises Vs. Principle Chief Commissioner of GST & Central Excise Tamil Nadu & Puducherry and Ors. – Madras High Court Read Post »

Sagar Ghosh Vs. Deputy Commissioner, State GST and Ors. – Calcutta High Court

  Start Free Trial ↗ Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password 👁 Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Sagar Ghosh Vs. Deputy Commissioner, State GST and Ors. – Calcutta High Court Read Post »

Bharathidasan University, Rep. by its Registrar Vs. Joint Commissioner of GST (ST-Intelligence) Trichy Division and Anr. – Supreme Court

  Start Free Trial ↗ Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password 👁 Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Bharathidasan University, Rep. by its Registrar Vs. Joint Commissioner of GST (ST-Intelligence) Trichy Division and Anr. – Supreme Court Read Post »

Rohit Kumar Gupta Vs. State of Punjab – Punjab & Haryana High Court

  Start Free Trial ↗ Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password 👁 Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Rohit Kumar Gupta Vs. State of Punjab – Punjab & Haryana High Court Read Post »

Usha Industries (India) Vs. Union of India and Ors. – Punjab & Haryana High Court

  Start Free Trial ↗ Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password 👁 Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Usha Industries (India) Vs. Union of India and Ors. – Punjab & Haryana High Court Read Post »

In a bail petition under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, where the accused under Section 132 of the CGST Act had been in custody for about four months, had clean antecedents, the evidence was documentary, no material showed likelihood of tampering or non-cooperation, and trial was not likely to conclude soon, bail was granted subject to conditions – Kuldip Singla Vs. Directorate General of GST – Punjab & Haryana High Court

  Start Free Trial ↗ Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password 👁 Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

In a bail petition under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, where the accused under Section 132 of the CGST Act had been in custody for about four months, had clean antecedents, the evidence was documentary, no material showed likelihood of tampering or non-cooperation, and trial was not likely to conclude soon, bail was granted subject to conditions – Kuldip Singla Vs. Directorate General of GST – Punjab & Haryana High Court Read Post »

Where in a CGST input tax credit prosecution the accused had about four months’ custody, clean antecedents, documentary evidence, no material showing likelihood of tampering or non-cooperation, and trial was not likely to conclude soon, bail was granted subject to conditions – Ratnesh Singla Vs. Directorate General of GST – Punjab & Haryana High Court

  Start Free Trial ↗ Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password 👁 Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Where in a CGST input tax credit prosecution the accused had about four months’ custody, clean antecedents, documentary evidence, no material showing likelihood of tampering or non-cooperation, and trial was not likely to conclude soon, bail was granted subject to conditions – Ratnesh Singla Vs. Directorate General of GST – Punjab & Haryana High Court Read Post »

Scroll to Top