44 (1)

Crossfields Synergy Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Taxes and Anr. – Karnataka High Court

  Start Free Trial ↗ Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password 👁 Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Crossfields Synergy Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Taxes and Anr. – Karnataka High Court Read Post »

Heramb Enterprises Vs. C Pushpalatha, Additional Commissioner of Commercial Taxes and Ors. – GSTAT, Bengaluru Bench

  Start Free Trial ↗ Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password 👁 Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Heramb Enterprises Vs. C Pushpalatha, Additional Commissioner of Commercial Taxes and Ors. – GSTAT, Bengaluru Bench Read Post »

G.R. Infra Projects Ltd. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and Ors. – Supreme Court

  Start Free Trial ↗ Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password 👁 Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

G.R. Infra Projects Ltd. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and Ors. – Supreme Court Read Post »

Kalanther Madeena Textiles Vs. Deputy Commissioner (CT) O/o. Deputy Commissioner (ST) and Anr. – Madras High Court

  Start Free Trial ↗ Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password 👁 Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Kalanther Madeena Textiles Vs. Deputy Commissioner (CT) O/o. Deputy Commissioner (ST) and Anr. – Madras High Court Read Post »

Kalanther Madeena Textiles Vs. Deputy Commissioner (CT) O/o. The Deputy Commissioner (ST) GST – Appeal and Anr. – Madras High Court

  Start Free Trial ↗ Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password 👁 Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Kalanther Madeena Textiles Vs. Deputy Commissioner (CT) O/o. The Deputy Commissioner (ST) GST – Appeal and Anr. – Madras High Court Read Post »

ACE Tech Heavy Fab Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State Tax Officer and Ors. – Madras High Court

  Start Free Trial ↗ Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password 👁 Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

ACE Tech Heavy Fab Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State Tax Officer and Ors. – Madras High Court Read Post »

Chemplast Sanmar Ltd. Vs. Assistant Commissioner (ST), State GST Office – Madras High Court

  Start Free Trial ↗ Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password 👁 Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Chemplast Sanmar Ltd. Vs. Assistant Commissioner (ST), State GST Office – Madras High Court Read Post »

Power Lead Electricals Vs. Deputy State Tax Officer-2 – Madras High Court

  Start Free Trial ↗ Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password 👁 Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Power Lead Electricals Vs. Deputy State Tax Officer-2 – Madras High Court Read Post »

Sampoornam (Deceased) Vs. Assistant Commissioner (ST) (FAC)/Commercial Tax Officer and Anr. – Madras High Court

  Start Free Trial ↗ Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password 👁 Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Sampoornam (Deceased) Vs. Assistant Commissioner (ST) (FAC)/Commercial Tax Officer and Anr. – Madras High Court Read Post »

Kumar and Co. Vs. State Tax Offficer, Hosur North -2 Assessment Circle – Madras High Court

  Start Free Trial ↗ Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password 👁 Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Kumar and Co. Vs. State Tax Offficer, Hosur North -2 Assessment Circle – Madras High Court Read Post »

Under Sections 44 and 47 of the CGST/TNGST Acts read with Rule 80(3), belated non-filing of Form GSTR-9C along with GSTR-9 amounts to failure to furnish the annual return as required by Section 44, justifying levy of late fee – Madhu Agencies Vs. State Tax Officer – Madras High Court

  Start Free Trial ↗ Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password 👁 Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Under Sections 44 and 47 of the CGST/TNGST Acts read with Rule 80(3), belated non-filing of Form GSTR-9C along with GSTR-9 amounts to failure to furnish the annual return as required by Section 44, justifying levy of late fee – Madhu Agencies Vs. State Tax Officer – Madras High Court Read Post »

Late fee under Section 47(2) of CGST Act, though termed a fee, is penal in nature | Once late fee is levied, general penalty under Section 125 cannot also be imposed – Kandan Hardware Mart Vs. Assistant Commissioner (ST) (FAC), Park Town Assessment Circle – Madras High Court

  Start Free Trial ↗ Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password 👁 Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Late fee under Section 47(2) of CGST Act, though termed a fee, is penal in nature | Once late fee is levied, general penalty under Section 125 cannot also be imposed – Kandan Hardware Mart Vs. Assistant Commissioner (ST) (FAC), Park Town Assessment Circle – Madras High Court Read Post »

[Section 73 and Section 74 of CGST Act]: A single Show Cause Notice (SCN) or a Single Composite Assessment Order cannot be passed in relation to more than one tax period of either a month if the assessment is taken up before the due date for filing of the annual return or for more than one year if the due date for filing of annual return has been reached – S J Constructions and Ors. Vs. The Assistant Commissioner and Ors. – Andhra Pradesh High Court

  Start Free Trial ↗ Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password 👁 Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

[Section 73 and Section 74 of CGST Act]: A single Show Cause Notice (SCN) or a Single Composite Assessment Order cannot be passed in relation to more than one tax period of either a month if the assessment is taken up before the due date for filing of the annual return or for more than one year if the due date for filing of annual return has been reached – S J Constructions and Ors. Vs. The Assistant Commissioner and Ors. – Andhra Pradesh High Court Read Post »

Tata Play Ltd. and Ors. Vs. Union of India and Ors. – Madras High Court

  Start Free Trial ↗ Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password 👁 Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Tata Play Ltd. and Ors. Vs. Union of India and Ors. – Madras High Court Read Post »

Scroll to Top