16 (2) (a)

Shree Karni Electrovision Vs. Union of India and Ors. – Rajasthan High Court

  Start Free Trial ↗ Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password 👁 Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Shree Karni Electrovision Vs. Union of India and Ors. – Rajasthan High Court Read Post »

Neelkanth Entrepreneurs Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of U.P. and Anr. – Allahabad High Court

  Start Free Trial ↗ Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password 👁 Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Neelkanth Entrepreneurs Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of U.P. and Anr. – Allahabad High Court Read Post »

Cart Infralog Ltd. and Anr. Vs. Additional Commissioner, HQ Anti-Evasion Unit and Ors. – Calcutta High Court

  Start Free Trial ↗ Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password 👁 Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Cart Infralog Ltd. and Anr. Vs. Additional Commissioner, HQ Anti-Evasion Unit and Ors. – Calcutta High Court Read Post »

Peekay Industries Vs. Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Karnataka – GSTAT, Bengaluru Bench

  Start Free Trial ↗ Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password 👁 Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Peekay Industries Vs. Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Karnataka – GSTAT, Bengaluru Bench Read Post »

Pr. Commissioner, CGST & CX, Siliguri Commissionerate Vs. Agarwala’s Bitumex Pvt. Ltd. – GSTAT, Kolkata Bench

  Start Free Trial ↗ Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password 👁 Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Pr. Commissioner, CGST & CX, Siliguri Commissionerate Vs. Agarwala’s Bitumex Pvt. Ltd. – GSTAT, Kolkata Bench Read Post »

Biocon Ltd. Vs. State of Karnataka and Ors. – Karnataka High Court

  Start Free Trial ↗ Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password 👁 Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Biocon Ltd. Vs. State of Karnataka and Ors. – Karnataka High Court Read Post »

Rajesh Vyas Vs. Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. and Ors. – Madhya Pradesh High Court

  Start Free Trial ↗ Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password 👁 Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Rajesh Vyas Vs. Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. and Ors. – Madhya Pradesh High Court Read Post »

Rule 39(1)(a) of the CGST Rules requiring distribution of input tax credit available for distribution in a month to be made in the same month must be construed harmoniously with Sections 16 and 20 of the CGST Act as applying only after fulfilment of Section 16(2) conditions, and is therefore not ultra vires – Reliance Jio Infocomm Ltd. Vs. Union of India and Ors. – Madras High Court

  Start Free Trial ↗ Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password 👁 Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Rule 39(1)(a) of the CGST Rules requiring distribution of input tax credit available for distribution in a month to be made in the same month must be construed harmoniously with Sections 16 and 20 of the CGST Act as applying only after fulfilment of Section 16(2) conditions, and is therefore not ultra vires – Reliance Jio Infocomm Ltd. Vs. Union of India and Ors. – Madras High Court Read Post »

In Re: Becton Dickinson India Pvt. Ltd. – Tamil Nadu AAR (GST)

(2025) taxcode.in 75 AARGST IN THE AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, TAMIL NADU GOODS AND SERVICES TAX In Re: Becton Dickinson India Pvt. Ltd. Ruling No. 20/ARA/2025 Decided on 09-May-25 Shri Balakrishna S, I.R.S., Additional Commissioner/Member (CGST) and Shri B.Suseel Kumar, B.E., MBA., Joint Commissioner/Member (SGST) Judgment/Order: Click here for Ruling

In Re: Becton Dickinson India Pvt. Ltd. – Tamil Nadu AAR (GST) Read Post »

Simplex Infrastructures Ltd. Vs. Asistant Commissioner of CGST, Division VII, Ahmedabad South and Ors. – Gujarat High Court

  Start Free Trial ↗ Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password 👁 Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Simplex Infrastructures Ltd. Vs. Asistant Commissioner of CGST, Division VII, Ahmedabad South and Ors. – Gujarat High Court Read Post »

L & T IHI Consortium Vs. Union of India and Ors. – Bombay High Court

  Start Free Trial ↗ Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password 👁 Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

L & T IHI Consortium Vs. Union of India and Ors. – Bombay High Court Read Post »

In re: Bharatiya Reserve Bank Note Mudran Pvt. Ltd. – Karnataka AAR (GST)

  Start Free Trial ↗ Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password 👁 Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

In re: Bharatiya Reserve Bank Note Mudran Pvt. Ltd. – Karnataka AAR (GST) Read Post »

Scroll to Top