132 (1) (h)

Pradeep Goyal and Anr. Vs. Union of India – Allahabad High Court

  Start Free Trial β†— Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password πŸ‘ Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Pradeep Goyal and Anr. Vs. Union of India – Allahabad High Court Read Post Β»

Karan Kochhar Vs. Inspector (Anti-Evasion) of CGST Commissionerate – Punjab & Haryana High Court

  Start Free Trial β†— Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password πŸ‘ Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Karan Kochhar Vs. Inspector (Anti-Evasion) of CGST Commissionerate – Punjab & Haryana High Court Read Post Β»

Mayank Bansal Vs. Union of India and Ors. – Gauhati High Court

  Start Free Trial β†— Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password πŸ‘ Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Mayank Bansal Vs. Union of India and Ors. – Gauhati High Court Read Post Β»

Rohit Kumar Gupta Vs. State of Punjab – Punjab & Haryana High Court

  Start Free Trial β†— Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password πŸ‘ Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Rohit Kumar Gupta Vs. State of Punjab – Punjab & Haryana High Court Read Post Β»

In a bail petition under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, where the accused under Section 132 of the CGST Act had been in custody for about four months, had clean antecedents, the evidence was documentary, no material showed likelihood of tampering or non-cooperation, and trial was not likely to conclude soon, bail was granted subject to conditions – Kuldip Singla Vs. Directorate General of GST – Punjab & Haryana High Court

  Start Free Trial β†— Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password πŸ‘ Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

In a bail petition under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, where the accused under Section 132 of the CGST Act had been in custody for about four months, had clean antecedents, the evidence was documentary, no material showed likelihood of tampering or non-cooperation, and trial was not likely to conclude soon, bail was granted subject to conditions – Kuldip Singla Vs. Directorate General of GST – Punjab & Haryana High Court Read Post Β»

Where in a CGST input tax credit prosecution the accused had about four months’ custody, clean antecedents, documentary evidence, no material showing likelihood of tampering or non-cooperation, and trial was not likely to conclude soon, bail was granted subject to conditions – Ratnesh Singla Vs. Directorate General of GST – Punjab & Haryana High Court

  Start Free Trial β†— Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password πŸ‘ Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Where in a CGST input tax credit prosecution the accused had about four months’ custody, clean antecedents, documentary evidence, no material showing likelihood of tampering or non-cooperation, and trial was not likely to conclude soon, bail was granted subject to conditions – Ratnesh Singla Vs. Directorate General of GST – Punjab & Haryana High Court Read Post Β»

Shivam Sadhwani Vs. Union of India and Ors. – Madhya Pradesh High Court

  Start Free Trial β†— Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password πŸ‘ Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Shivam Sadhwani Vs. Union of India and Ors. – Madhya Pradesh High Court Read Post Β»

Prince Kumar and Anr. Vs. State of Punjab and Anr. – Punjab & Haryana High Court

  Start Free Trial β†— Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password πŸ‘ Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Prince Kumar and Anr. Vs. State of Punjab and Anr. – Punjab & Haryana High Court Read Post Β»

Narender Kumar Vs. Directorate General of GST Intelligence – Delhi High Court

  Start Free Trial β†— Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password πŸ‘ Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Narender Kumar Vs. Directorate General of GST Intelligence – Delhi High Court Read Post Β»

Scroll to Top