132 (1) (a)

Navinder Singh Sahdev Vs. Directorate General of GST Intelligence – Punjab & Haryana High Court

  Start Free Trial ↗ Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password 👁 Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Navinder Singh Sahdev Vs. Directorate General of GST Intelligence – Punjab & Haryana High Court Read Post »

Venkatasubbaiah C and Anr. Vs. Superintendent of Central Tax and Anr. – Karnataka High Court

  Start Free Trial ↗ Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password 👁 Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Venkatasubbaiah C and Anr. Vs. Superintendent of Central Tax and Anr. – Karnataka High Court Read Post »

Mohammed Kamran Vs. Senior Intelligence Officer, Directorate General of Goods and Service Tax Intelligence and Ors. – Karnataka High Court

  Start Free Trial ↗ Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password 👁 Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Mohammed Kamran Vs. Senior Intelligence Officer, Directorate General of Goods and Service Tax Intelligence and Ors. – Karnataka High Court Read Post »

Where reasons to believe recorded under section 69 of the CGST Act are in substance furnished to the arrestee and are not at variance with the Commissioner’s e-office notings, non-supply of a verbatim signed copy does not render the arrest or remand illegal, though a habeas corpus petition alleging breach of statutory mandate remains maintainable – Keyur Jayendrabhai Patel Vs. State of Gujarat and Ors. – Gujarat High Court

  Start Free Trial ↗ Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password 👁 Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Where reasons to believe recorded under section 69 of the CGST Act are in substance furnished to the arrestee and are not at variance with the Commissioner’s e-office notings, non-supply of a verbatim signed copy does not render the arrest or remand illegal, though a habeas corpus petition alleging breach of statutory mandate remains maintainable – Keyur Jayendrabhai Patel Vs. State of Gujarat and Ors. – Gujarat High Court Read Post »

Shri Rishi Nand Kishore Gupta Vs. Union of India – Telangana High Court

  Start Free Trial ↗ Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password 👁 Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Shri Rishi Nand Kishore Gupta Vs. Union of India – Telangana High Court Read Post »

Where search and seizure under Section 67(2) of the CGST Act had culminated in issuance of notice under Section 74 and the petitioners had statutory remedies including participation in adjudication and provisional release of goods under Section 67(6) read with Rule 140(1) – Ankit Dubey Vs. Prinicipal Commissioner of Central Goods and Service Tax CGST Bhopal GST Bhawan and Ors. – Madhya Pradesh High Court

  Start Free Trial ↗ Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password 👁 Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Where search and seizure under Section 67(2) of the CGST Act had culminated in issuance of notice under Section 74 and the petitioners had statutory remedies including participation in adjudication and provisional release of goods under Section 67(6) read with Rule 140(1) – Ankit Dubey Vs. Prinicipal Commissioner of Central Goods and Service Tax CGST Bhopal GST Bhawan and Ors. – Madhya Pradesh High Court Read Post »

Saurabh Bansal Vs. Directorate General of GST, Intelligence – Punjab & Haryana High Court

  Start Free Trial ↗ Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password 👁 Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Saurabh Bansal Vs. Directorate General of GST, Intelligence – Punjab & Haryana High Court Read Post »

Scroll to Top