13 (8) (b)

Vishal Chaudhary Vs. Mcdonald’s India Pvt. Ltd. – GSTAT, Delhi Bench

  Start Free Trial β†— Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password πŸ‘ Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Vishal Chaudhary Vs. Mcdonald’s India Pvt. Ltd. – GSTAT, Delhi Bench Read Post Β»

Vishal Chaudhary Vs. Honour Lane Logistics India Pvt. Ltd. – GSTAT, Delhi Bench

  Start Free Trial β†— Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password πŸ‘ Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Vishal Chaudhary Vs. Honour Lane Logistics India Pvt. Ltd. – GSTAT, Delhi Bench Read Post Β»

Vishal Chaudhary Vs. Honour Lane Logistics India Pvt. Ltd. – GSTAT, Delhi Bench

  Start Free Trial β†— Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password πŸ‘ Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Vishal Chaudhary Vs. Honour Lane Logistics India Pvt. Ltd. – GSTAT, Delhi Bench Read Post Β»

Services rendered by a foreign group procurement hub to its Indian group entity, being core procurement services supplied on its own account and not ancillary facilitation, are not intermediary services under Sections 2(13) and 13(8)(b) of the IGST Act, and the tax paid thereon as import of services is not refundable though rejection cannot be sustained merely as an afterthought under Section 54 – Dow Chemical International Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of State Tax, Mazgaon, Mumbai and Ors. – GSTAT Principal Bench

  Start Free Trial β†— Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password πŸ‘ Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Services rendered by a foreign group procurement hub to its Indian group entity, being core procurement services supplied on its own account and not ancillary facilitation, are not intermediary services under Sections 2(13) and 13(8)(b) of the IGST Act, and the tax paid thereon as import of services is not refundable though rejection cannot be sustained merely as an afterthought under Section 54 – Dow Chemical International Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of State Tax, Mazgaon, Mumbai and Ors. – GSTAT Principal Bench Read Post Β»

Commscope India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. The Additional Commissioner Appeals – I and Ors. – Telangana High Court

  Start Free Trial β†— Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password πŸ‘ Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Commscope India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. The Additional Commissioner Appeals – I and Ors. – Telangana High Court Read Post Β»

In re: DCW Ltd. – Tamil Nadu AAR (GST)In re: DCW Ltd. – Tamil Nadu AAR (GST)

  Start Free Trial β†— Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password πŸ‘ Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

In re: DCW Ltd. – Tamil Nadu AAR (GST)In re: DCW Ltd. – Tamil Nadu AAR (GST) Read Post Β»

Dharmendra M. Jani Vs. Union of India and Ors. – Bombay High Court

  Start Free Trial β†— Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password πŸ‘ Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Dharmendra M. Jani Vs. Union of India and Ors. – Bombay High Court Read Post Β»

Dharmendra M. Jani Vs. Union of India and Ors. – Bombay High Court dated 18.04.2023

  Start Free Trial β†— Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password πŸ‘ Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Dharmendra M. Jani Vs. Union of India and Ors. – Bombay High Court dated 18.04.2023 Read Post Β»

Ernst and Young Ltd. Vs. Additional Commissioner, CGST and Anr. – Delhi High Court

  Start Free Trial β†— Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password πŸ‘ Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Ernst and Young Ltd. Vs. Additional Commissioner, CGST and Anr. – Delhi High Court Read Post Β»

In re: Gandour India Food Processing Pvt. Ltd. – Telangana AAR (GST)

  Start Free Trial β†— Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password πŸ‘ Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

In re: Gandour India Food Processing Pvt. Ltd. – Telangana AAR (GST) Read Post Β»

Scroll to Top