11 (3)

Where challenge to GST demand on BOT annuity receipts turns on service classification, exemption under Entry 23A and competence of officers acting under notifications issued under Sections 3 and 5 of the CGST Act, and no patent lack of jurisdiction or other exception to the rule of alternate remedy is established, writ petition against the show cause notice and Order-in-Original is not maintainable and the assessee must pursue appeal under Section 107 – Jorabat Shillong Expressway Ltd. Vs. Union of India and Ors. – Meghalaya High Court

  Start Free Trial β†— Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password πŸ‘ Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Where challenge to GST demand on BOT annuity receipts turns on service classification, exemption under Entry 23A and competence of officers acting under notifications issued under Sections 3 and 5 of the CGST Act, and no patent lack of jurisdiction or other exception to the rule of alternate remedy is established, writ petition against the show cause notice and Order-in-Original is not maintainable and the assessee must pursue appeal under Section 107 – Jorabat Shillong Expressway Ltd. Vs. Union of India and Ors. – Meghalaya High Court Read Post Β»

Late fee under Section 47(2) of CGST Act, though termed a fee, is penal in nature | Once late fee is levied, general penalty under Section 125 cannot also be imposed – Kandan Hardware Mart Vs. Assistant Commissioner (ST) (FAC), Park Town Assessment Circle – Madras High Court

  Start Free Trial β†— Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password πŸ‘ Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Late fee under Section 47(2) of CGST Act, though termed a fee, is penal in nature | Once late fee is levied, general penalty under Section 125 cannot also be imposed – Kandan Hardware Mart Vs. Assistant Commissioner (ST) (FAC), Park Town Assessment Circle – Madras High Court Read Post Β»

West Bengal State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd. Vs. Additional Director and Ors. – Calcutta High Court

  Start Free Trial β†— Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password πŸ‘ Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

West Bengal State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd. Vs. Additional Director and Ors. – Calcutta High Court Read Post Β»

In re: SLN Tech-Fabs (Bengaluru) Pvt. Ltd. – Karnataka AAR (GST)

  Start Free Trial β†— Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password πŸ‘ Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

In re: SLN Tech-Fabs (Bengaluru) Pvt. Ltd. – Karnataka AAR (GST) Read Post Β»

Scroll to Top