05 (3)

Assistant Commissioner, CGST & Central Excise Vs. Filatex India Ltd. – GSTAT, Surat Bench

  Start Free Trial ↗ Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password 👁 Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Assistant Commissioner, CGST & Central Excise Vs. Filatex India Ltd. – GSTAT, Surat Bench Read Post »

Fastenex Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State Tax Officer (Inspection-VI) – Madras High Court

  Start Free Trial ↗ Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password 👁 Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Fastenex Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State Tax Officer (Inspection-VI) – Madras High Court Read Post »

Services rendered by a foreign group procurement hub to its Indian group entity, being core procurement services supplied on its own account and not ancillary facilitation, are not intermediary services under Sections 2(13) and 13(8)(b) of the IGST Act, and the tax paid thereon as import of services is not refundable though rejection cannot be sustained merely as an afterthought under Section 54 – Dow Chemical International Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of State Tax, Mazgaon, Mumbai and Ors. – GSTAT Principal Bench

  Start Free Trial ↗ Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password 👁 Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Services rendered by a foreign group procurement hub to its Indian group entity, being core procurement services supplied on its own account and not ancillary facilitation, are not intermediary services under Sections 2(13) and 13(8)(b) of the IGST Act, and the tax paid thereon as import of services is not refundable though rejection cannot be sustained merely as an afterthought under Section 54 – Dow Chemical International Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of State Tax, Mazgaon, Mumbai and Ors. – GSTAT Principal Bench Read Post »

Settlement of a foreign arbitral award and consequential withdrawal or suspension of enforcement proceedings, absent any independent agreement and separate consideration, do not constitute supply under Section 7 read with Entry 5(e) of Schedule II of the CGST Act – Tata Sons Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India and Ors. – Bombay High Court

  Start Free Trial ↗ Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password 👁 Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Settlement of a foreign arbitral award and consequential withdrawal or suspension of enforcement proceedings, absent any independent agreement and separate consideration, do not constitute supply under Section 7 read with Entry 5(e) of Schedule II of the CGST Act – Tata Sons Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India and Ors. – Bombay High Court Read Post »

A judgment of a Constitutional Court declaring a law applies retrospectively unless it is expressly made prospective, whereas a statute applies prospectively unless it is expressly made retrospective – Sunrise Timply Company Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India and Ors. – Calcutta High Court

  Start Free Trial ↗ Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password 👁 Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

A judgment of a Constitutional Court declaring a law applies retrospectively unless it is expressly made prospective, whereas a statute applies prospectively unless it is expressly made retrospective – Sunrise Timply Company Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India and Ors. – Calcutta High Court Read Post »

West India Continental Oils Fats Pvt. Ltd. Vs. The Union of India and Ors. – Bombay High Court

  Start Free Trial ↗ Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password 👁 Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

West India Continental Oils Fats Pvt. Ltd. Vs. The Union of India and Ors. – Bombay High Court Read Post »

Alstom Transport India Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Commercial Taxes – Karnataka High Court and Ors.

  Start Free Trial ↗ Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password 👁 Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Alstom Transport India Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Commercial Taxes – Karnataka High Court and Ors. Read Post »

Torrent Power Ltd. Vs. Union of India and Anr. – Gujarat High Court

  Start Free Trial ↗ Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password 👁 Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Torrent Power Ltd. Vs. Union of India and Anr. – Gujarat High Court Read Post »

Power Grid Corporation of India Ltd. Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. – Rajasthan High Court

  Start Free Trial ↗ Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password 👁 Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Power Grid Corporation of India Ltd. Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. – Rajasthan High Court Read Post »

Pace Setters Business Solutions Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India and Ors. – Delhi High Court

  Start Free Trial ↗ Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password 👁 Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Pace Setters Business Solutions Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India and Ors. – Delhi High Court Read Post »

In re: Subway Systems India Pvt. Ltd., (Now Eversub India Pvt. Ltd.) – Haryana AAAR (GST)

  Start Free Trial ↗ Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password 👁 Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

In re: Subway Systems India Pvt. Ltd., (Now Eversub India Pvt. Ltd.) – Haryana AAAR (GST) Read Post »

In re: Mahavir Nagar Shiv Shrusti Co-Operative Housing Society Ltd. – Maharashtra AAAR (GST)

  Start Free Trial ↗ Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password 👁 Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

In re: Mahavir Nagar Shiv Shrusti Co-Operative Housing Society Ltd. – Maharashtra AAAR (GST) Read Post »

Scroll to Top