02 (93)

Torrent Power Ltd. Vs. Union of India and Ors. – Gujarat High Court

  Start Free Trial β†— Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password πŸ‘ Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Torrent Power Ltd. Vs. Union of India and Ors. – Gujarat High Court Read Post Β»

Fastenex Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State Tax Officer (Inspection-VI) – Madras High Court

  Start Free Trial β†— Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password πŸ‘ Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Fastenex Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State Tax Officer (Inspection-VI) – Madras High Court Read Post Β»

Where e-commerce doorstep delivery charges were contractually split and described as GT charges, but the end customer did not independently contract with or control the transporter and the activity involved hub-based logistics and last-mile delivery, the service was held not classifiable as exempt Goods Transport Agency service under Sl. No. 21A of Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate) but as taxable courier/logistics/fulfillment service – Imankalyan Sarbajna, Joint Commissioner, State Tax Vs. Flipkart India Pvt. Ltd. – AAAR West Bengal

  Start Free Trial β†— Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password πŸ‘ Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Where e-commerce doorstep delivery charges were contractually split and described as GT charges, but the end customer did not independently contract with or control the transporter and the activity involved hub-based logistics and last-mile delivery, the service was held not classifiable as exempt Goods Transport Agency service under Sl. No. 21A of Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate) but as taxable courier/logistics/fulfillment service – Imankalyan Sarbajna, Joint Commissioner, State Tax Vs. Flipkart India Pvt. Ltd. – AAAR West Bengal Read Post Β»

Directorate General of Goods and Services Tax Intelligence (HQS) and Ors. Vs. Gameskraft Technologies Pvt. Ltd. and Ors. – Supreme Court

  Start Free Trial β†— Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password πŸ‘ Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Directorate General of Goods and Services Tax Intelligence (HQS) and Ors. Vs. Gameskraft Technologies Pvt. Ltd. and Ors. – Supreme Court Read Post Β»

Where subsummation of service tax, VAT, entertainment tax and other levies into GST with additional input tax credit reduced the effective tax incidence on DTH services, retention of the same subscription price without commensurate reduction amounted to profiteering under Section 171 of the CGST Act – Director General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) Vs. Tata Play Ltd. (Formerly Tata Play Ltd.) – GSTAT Principal Bench

  Start Free Trial β†— Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password πŸ‘ Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Where subsummation of service tax, VAT, entertainment tax and other levies into GST with additional input tax credit reduced the effective tax incidence on DTH services, retention of the same subscription price without commensurate reduction amounted to profiteering under Section 171 of the CGST Act – Director General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) Vs. Tata Play Ltd. (Formerly Tata Play Ltd.) – GSTAT Principal Bench Read Post Β»

In re: Sigma Electric Manufacturing Corporation Pvt. Ltd. – Maharashtra AAR (GST)

  Start Free Trial β†— Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password πŸ‘ Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

In re: Sigma Electric Manufacturing Corporation Pvt. Ltd. – Maharashtra AAR (GST) Read Post Β»

Commissioner of Central Tax, CGST Delhi East Vs. T C Global India Pvt. Ltd. – Delhi High Court

  Start Free Trial β†— Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password πŸ‘ Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Commissioner of Central Tax, CGST Delhi East Vs. T C Global India Pvt. Ltd. – Delhi High Court Read Post Β»

Shyamaraju and Co (India) Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Commercial Taxes (Audit) 1.7 and Anr. – Karnataka High Court

  Start Free Trial β†— Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password πŸ‘ Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Shyamaraju and Co (India) Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Commercial Taxes (Audit) 1.7 and Anr. – Karnataka High Court Read Post Β»

In re: Batcha Noorjahan (School Transport) – AAAR Tamil Nadu

(2025) taxcode.in 18 AAARGST IN THE APPELLATE AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, TAMIL NADU GOODS AND SERVICES TAX In re: Batcha Noorjahan (School Transport) Order-in-Appeal No. AAAR/ 3 /2025 (AR) Decided on 23-Jun-25 Dr. Ram Niwas, I.R.S., Principal Chief Commissioner of GST & Central Excise, Member and Dr. D. Jagannathan, I.A.S., Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Member

In re: Batcha Noorjahan (School Transport) – AAAR Tamil Nadu Read Post Β»

Scroll to Top