02 (63)

Jupiter Buildtech Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of State Tax and Ors. – GSTAT, Agra Bench

  Start Free Trial ↗ Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password 👁 Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Jupiter Buildtech Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of State Tax and Ors. – GSTAT, Agra Bench Read Post »

Dilip Babubhai Patel Vs. State of Gujarat and Anr. – Gujarat High Court

  Start Free Trial ↗ Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password 👁 Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Dilip Babubhai Patel Vs. State of Gujarat and Anr. – Gujarat High Court Read Post »

Rule 39(1)(a) of the CGST Rules requiring distribution of input tax credit available for distribution in a month to be made in the same month must be construed harmoniously with Sections 16 and 20 of the CGST Act as applying only after fulfilment of Section 16(2) conditions, and is therefore not ultra vires – Reliance Jio Infocomm Ltd. Vs. Union of India and Ors. – Madras High Court

  Start Free Trial ↗ Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password 👁 Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Rule 39(1)(a) of the CGST Rules requiring distribution of input tax credit available for distribution in a month to be made in the same month must be construed harmoniously with Sections 16 and 20 of the CGST Act as applying only after fulfilment of Section 16(2) conditions, and is therefore not ultra vires – Reliance Jio Infocomm Ltd. Vs. Union of India and Ors. – Madras High Court Read Post »

Union of India and Ors. Vs. SICPA India Pvt. Ltd. and Anr. – Sikkim High Court

  Start Free Trial ↗ Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password 👁 Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Union of India and Ors. Vs. SICPA India Pvt. Ltd. and Anr. – Sikkim High Court Read Post »

Bharat Aluminium Company Ltd. Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and Ors. – Chhattisgarh High Court

  Start Free Trial ↗ Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password 👁 Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Bharat Aluminium Company Ltd. Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and Ors. – Chhattisgarh High Court Read Post »

Deendayal Port Authority Through Secretary Vs. Union of India and Ors. – Gujarat High Court

  Start Free Trial ↗ Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password 👁 Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Deendayal Port Authority Through Secretary Vs. Union of India and Ors. – Gujarat High Court Read Post »

The time limit provided for furnishing of report by DGAP is directory in nature and not mandatory | Section 171 of the CGST Act, 2017 is widely worded and does not limit the scope of examination to only goods and services in respect of which a complaint is received | The scope of the DGAP’s powers is very wide and is not limited to the goods or services in relation to which a Complaint is received – Reckitt Benckiser India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India and Ors. – Delhi High Court

  Start Free Trial ↗ Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password 👁 Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

The time limit provided for furnishing of report by DGAP is directory in nature and not mandatory | Section 171 of the CGST Act, 2017 is widely worded and does not limit the scope of examination to only goods and services in respect of which a complaint is received | The scope of the DGAP’s powers is very wide and is not limited to the goods or services in relation to which a Complaint is received – Reckitt Benckiser India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India and Ors. – Delhi High Court Read Post »

In re: Mahavir Nagar Shiv Shrusti Co-Operative Housing Society Ltd. – Maharashtra AAAR (GST)

  Start Free Trial ↗ Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password 👁 Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

In re: Mahavir Nagar Shiv Shrusti Co-Operative Housing Society Ltd. – Maharashtra AAAR (GST) Read Post »

Union of India and Ors. Vs. VKC Footsteps India Pvt. Ltd. – Supreme Court

  Start Free Trial ↗ Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password 👁 Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Union of India and Ors. Vs. VKC Footsteps India Pvt. Ltd. – Supreme Court Read Post »

North End Food Marketing Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of U P and Ors. – Allahabad High Court

  Start Free Trial ↗ Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password 👁 Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

North End Food Marketing Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of U P and Ors. – Allahabad High Court Read Post »

In re: Jaideepispat and Alloys Pvt. Ltd. – Madhya Pradesh AAR (GST)

  Start Free Trial ↗ Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password 👁 Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

In re: Jaideepispat and Alloys Pvt. Ltd. – Madhya Pradesh AAR (GST) Read Post »

Scroll to Top