02 (60)

Commissioner CGST & CX Vs. Santosh Fragrance – GSTAT, Kolkata Bench

  Start Free Trial ↗ Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password 👁 Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Commissioner CGST & CX Vs. Santosh Fragrance – GSTAT, Kolkata Bench Read Post »

Augustan Textile Colours (Unit of Augustan Knitwear Pvt. Ltd.) Vs. Commissioner of State Tax – GSTAT, Ernakulam Bench

  Start Free Trial ↗ Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password 👁 Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Augustan Textile Colours (Unit of Augustan Knitwear Pvt. Ltd.) Vs. Commissioner of State Tax – GSTAT, Ernakulam Bench Read Post »

Rule 39(1)(a) of the CGST Rules requiring distribution of input tax credit available for distribution in a month to be made in the same month must be construed harmoniously with Sections 16 and 20 of the CGST Act as applying only after fulfilment of Section 16(2) conditions, and is therefore not ultra vires – Reliance Jio Infocomm Ltd. Vs. Union of India and Ors. – Madras High Court

  Start Free Trial ↗ Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password 👁 Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Rule 39(1)(a) of the CGST Rules requiring distribution of input tax credit available for distribution in a month to be made in the same month must be construed harmoniously with Sections 16 and 20 of the CGST Act as applying only after fulfilment of Section 16(2) conditions, and is therefore not ultra vires – Reliance Jio Infocomm Ltd. Vs. Union of India and Ors. – Madras High Court Read Post »

Union of India and Ors. Vs. SICPA India Pvt. Ltd. and Anr. – Sikkim High Court

  Start Free Trial ↗ Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password 👁 Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Union of India and Ors. Vs. SICPA India Pvt. Ltd. and Anr. – Sikkim High Court Read Post »

Bharat Aluminium Company Ltd. Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and Ors. – Chhattisgarh High Court

  Start Free Trial ↗ Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password 👁 Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Bharat Aluminium Company Ltd. Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and Ors. – Chhattisgarh High Court Read Post »

Union of India and Ors. Vs. VKC Footsteps India Pvt. Ltd. – Supreme Court

  Start Free Trial ↗ Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password 👁 Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Union of India and Ors. Vs. VKC Footsteps India Pvt. Ltd. – Supreme Court Read Post »

Scroll to Top