02 (108)

Where corporate guarantees issued by a holding company to secure loans for its subsidiaries expressly carry no fee, commission or other consideration, their execution is not a taxable supply of service under Section 9 read with Section 7 of the CGST Act – D P Jain & Co. Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India and Ors. – Bombay High Court

  Start Free Trial ↗ Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password 👁 Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Where corporate guarantees issued by a holding company to secure loans for its subsidiaries expressly carry no fee, commission or other consideration, their execution is not a taxable supply of service under Section 9 read with Section 7 of the CGST Act – D P Jain & Co. Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India and Ors. – Bombay High Court Read Post »

Shyamaraju and Co (India) Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Commercial Taxes (Audit) 1.7 and Anr. – Karnataka High Court

  Start Free Trial ↗ Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password 👁 Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Shyamaraju and Co (India) Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Commercial Taxes (Audit) 1.7 and Anr. – Karnataka High Court Read Post »

Marcowagon Retail Pvt. Ltd. and Anr. Vs. Union of India and Ors. – Gujarat High Court

  Start Free Trial ↗ Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password 👁 Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Marcowagon Retail Pvt. Ltd. and Anr. Vs. Union of India and Ors. – Gujarat High Court Read Post »

Alstom Transport India Ltd. Vs. Additional Commissioner of Central Tax and Ors. – Andhra Pradesh High Court

  Start Free Trial ↗ Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password 👁 Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Alstom Transport India Ltd. Vs. Additional Commissioner of Central Tax and Ors. – Andhra Pradesh High Court Read Post »

Central Electricity Regulatory Commission Vs. Additional Director Directorate General of GST Intelligence (DGGI) and Anr. – Delhi High Court

  Start Free Trial ↗ Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password 👁 Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Central Electricity Regulatory Commission Vs. Additional Director Directorate General of GST Intelligence (DGGI) and Anr. – Delhi High Court Read Post »

The time limit provided for furnishing of report by DGAP is directory in nature and not mandatory | Section 171 of the CGST Act, 2017 is widely worded and does not limit the scope of examination to only goods and services in respect of which a complaint is received | The scope of the DGAP’s powers is very wide and is not limited to the goods or services in relation to which a Complaint is received – Reckitt Benckiser India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India and Ors. – Delhi High Court

  Start Free Trial ↗ Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password 👁 Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

The time limit provided for furnishing of report by DGAP is directory in nature and not mandatory | Section 171 of the CGST Act, 2017 is widely worded and does not limit the scope of examination to only goods and services in respect of which a complaint is received | The scope of the DGAP’s powers is very wide and is not limited to the goods or services in relation to which a Complaint is received – Reckitt Benckiser India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India and Ors. – Delhi High Court Read Post »

In re: Aarav Consultancy Services Pvt. Ltd. – Chhattisgarh AAR (GST)

  Start Free Trial ↗ Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password 👁 Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

In re: Aarav Consultancy Services Pvt. Ltd. – Chhattisgarh AAR (GST) Read Post »

Scroll to Top