02 (102)

Goutam Engineering Concern Vs. West Bengal State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd. and Ors. – Calcutta High Court

  Start Free Trial ↗ Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password 👁 Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Goutam Engineering Concern Vs. West Bengal State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd. and Ors. – Calcutta High Court Read Post »

Council for the Indian School Certificate Examinations Vs. CGST Delhi East, Commissioner, ITO and Ors. – GSTAT, Delhi Bench

  Start Free Trial ↗ Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password 👁 Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Council for the Indian School Certificate Examinations Vs. CGST Delhi East, Commissioner, ITO and Ors. – GSTAT, Delhi Bench Read Post »

Torrent Power Ltd. Vs. Union of India and Ors. – Gujarat High Court

  Start Free Trial ↗ Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password 👁 Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Torrent Power Ltd. Vs. Union of India and Ors. – Gujarat High Court Read Post »

Where corporate guarantees issued by a holding company to secure loans for its subsidiaries expressly carry no fee, commission or other consideration, their execution is not a taxable supply of service under Section 9 read with Section 7 of the CGST Act – D P Jain & Co. Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India and Ors. – Bombay High Court

  Start Free Trial ↗ Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password 👁 Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Where corporate guarantees issued by a holding company to secure loans for its subsidiaries expressly carry no fee, commission or other consideration, their execution is not a taxable supply of service under Section 9 read with Section 7 of the CGST Act – D P Jain & Co. Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India and Ors. – Bombay High Court Read Post »

Canara Bank (Formerly Syndicate Bank) Vs. Union of India and Ors. – Karnataka High Court

  Start Free Trial ↗ Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password 👁 Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Canara Bank (Formerly Syndicate Bank) Vs. Union of India and Ors. – Karnataka High Court Read Post »

Assignment by sale and transfer of GIDC leasehold rights to a third-party assignee for consideration is transfer of benefits arising out of immovable property and not a supply of service under Section 7(1)(a) of the GST Act – Luna Chemical Industries Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India and Ors. – Gujarat High Court

  Start Free Trial ↗ Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password 👁 Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Assignment by sale and transfer of GIDC leasehold rights to a third-party assignee for consideration is transfer of benefits arising out of immovable property and not a supply of service under Section 7(1)(a) of the GST Act – Luna Chemical Industries Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India and Ors. – Gujarat High Court Read Post »

Assignment by sale and transfer of 99-year GIDC leasehold rights in favour of a third-party assignee for consideration is transfer of benefits arising from immovable property and not a supply of service, hence not liable to GST under Section 7(1)(a) read with Schedule II and Schedule III of the CGST Act – Jubilee Engineers Vs. Deputy Commissioner and Anr. – Gujarat High Court

  Start Free Trial ↗ Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password 👁 Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Assignment by sale and transfer of 99-year GIDC leasehold rights in favour of a third-party assignee for consideration is transfer of benefits arising from immovable property and not a supply of service, hence not liable to GST under Section 7(1)(a) read with Schedule II and Schedule III of the CGST Act – Jubilee Engineers Vs. Deputy Commissioner and Anr. – Gujarat High Court Read Post »

Assignment by sale and transfer of GIDC leasehold rights for consideration is transfer of benefits arising out of immovable property and not supply under Section 7(1)(a) of the CGST Act, hence GST is not leviable – Forward Crop Protection Pvt. Ltd Vs. Union of India and Ors. – Gujarat High Court

  Start Free Trial ↗ Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password 👁 Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Assignment by sale and transfer of GIDC leasehold rights for consideration is transfer of benefits arising out of immovable property and not supply under Section 7(1)(a) of the CGST Act, hence GST is not leviable – Forward Crop Protection Pvt. Ltd Vs. Union of India and Ors. – Gujarat High Court Read Post »

Are corpus funds collected by a residential association for future contingencies treated as consideration under the GST Act, and do they attract GST? – In re: Liberty Square Apartment Owners Association – Karnataka AAR (GST)

  Start Free Trial ↗ Already have an account or subscription? Log in below to continue. Login Access Default, Dispute, and Debt Resolution Laws Password Email OTP WhatsApp OTP Google Username or Email Password 👁 Remember this device Log In Forgot Password? Email Send OTP Enter OTP Verify & Login Resend OTP Remember this device

Are corpus funds collected by a residential association for future contingencies treated as consideration under the GST Act, and do they attract GST? – In re: Liberty Square Apartment Owners Association – Karnataka AAR (GST) Read Post »

Scroll to Top